"A great deal of political attention at international, regional and national levels has been focused on the question of marketing and advertising foods and beverages to children. The food and beverage industry...is making significant progress in both expanding and strengthening advertising self-regulatory processes globally...we recognize that, where it is not already the case, we should apply our individual marketing and advertising commitments on a global basis."

— IFBA letter to WHO Director-General Dr. Margaret Chan 13 May, 2008

 

IFBA members have voluntarily adopted a strategy designed to change how and what they advertise to children under 12 years of age around the world, which has proven effective in helping to drive change in the marketplace and in improving the nutrition of foods marketed to children. This strategy is based on three actions:

  • Implement IFBA’s Global Policy on Marketing Communications to Children, which is in line with the aims of WHO’s 2010 Set of Recommendations on Marketing to Children, and designed to reduce the impact on children of the marketing of foods high in fats, sugar and salt and increase their exposure to foods and beverages compatible with a balanced diet and healthy, active lifestyle.
  • Encourage other industry players to implement regional and national policy to restrict advertising and marketing to children based on the core tenets of IFBA’s Global Policy.
  • Monitor and evaluate compliance and impact.
IFBA’s Global Policy is in line with the aims of the 2010 WHO Set of Recommendations on the Marketing of Foods and Non-alcoholic Beverages to Children, and provides minimum criteria for advertising and marketing communications directed to children under 12 years that are paid for, or controlled by, IFBA companies in every country where they market their products. The policy builds upon existing commitments to
The consolidated ICC code on Advertising and Marketing Communication Practice.
Read IFBA's Global Policy on Marketing Communications to Children
Read IFBA's Global Policy on Marketing Communications to Children Explained
The IFBA Global Policy on Marketing Communications to Children is the basis for determining individual company marketing policies.Read IFBA members' marketing to children policies:

The Coca-Cola Company

Ferrero

General Mills

Grupo Bimbo

Kellogg Company

McDonald's

Mondelēz International

Mars, Incorporated

Nestlé S.A.

PepsiCo, Inc.

Unilever

Designing a framework for marketing food and beverages responsibly on a global scale is a challenge. To have the greatest impact and to deliver the most effective consumer protection, the model must be predicated on what can be achieved at an international, regional, national, industry and company level, and also be sensitive to variances in community standards. Each level of regulation and oversight must be subject to regular re-evaluation and monitoring to ensure that the system is responsive to public policy objectives.

Effective and responsible marketing to children also demands a multi-faceted approach to address both "how" products are being marketed to children and "what" products are being advertised to children.
Industry has developed a blueprint — which it is implementing globally — designed to address each of these issues.

The pyramid is divided into five tiers. The bottom three tiers address the "how" of advertising and marketing — i.e. the marketing techniques companies use. This requires an adherence to legal and ethical standards dictated by national or regional legal systems that prohibit deceptive or misleading advertising, and by national self-regulatory organizations, whose role is to police, monitor and enforce codes of conduct (e.g.The Consolidated ICC Code on Advertising and Marketing Communication Practice (9th ed. 2011), ensuring that advertising is legal, decent, honest and truthful, as well as codes of conduct specific to food marketing, such as the ICC Framework for Responsible Food and Non-alcoholic Beverage Marketing Communications (2012) which sets down the global minimum requirements for food and beverage marketing communications.

The top two tiers of the pyramid address the "what" — i.e. the products companies advertise. While IFBA members may represent a significant share of the market globally, they may not represent a significant share in national markets and for this reason, IFBA members have committed to promote "best practice" among local and regional players through national pledge programmes to encourage them to follow IFBA's lead and improve the types of products they advertise to children.

Regional and national pledges are based on the core tenets of the IFBA Global Policy on Advertising and Marketing Communications to Children.

Pledges were first introduced in 2006 and now cover 51 countries, including the 27 countries of the European Union, the six countries of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, and  Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, the Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey and the U.S.A.

In countries where there is no pledge currently, the IFBA Global Policy on Advertising and Marketing Communications to Children applies to IFBA member companies’ marketing practices.

Regional/National Marketing Pledges Implemented

Year Region/Country Description
2006 flag-eu-150
EU
The Union of European Beverages Association (UNESDA) Pledge
flag-australia-150
Australia
Australian Beverage Industry
flag-usa-150
U.S.A.
U.S. Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative
(18 companies, representing about 80% of child-directed TV food advertising)
2007 flag-canada-150
Canada
The Canadian Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative
(18 companies)
flag-eu-150
EU
The EU Pledge
(22 companies, representing more than 80% of food and beverage advertising spend)
2008 flag-thailand-150
Thailand
Thailand Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative
(7 companies)
flag-australia-150
Australia
Australian Responsible Children’s Marketing Initiative
(17 companies)
2009 flag-south-africa-150
South Africa
South Africa Pledge on Marketing to Children
(31 companies)
flag-brazil-150
Brazil
Brazil Public Commitment on Food and Beverage Advertising to Children
(11 companies)
Expanded and strengthened in 2016
Brazil Pledge Nutrition Criteria
flag-russia-150
Russia
Russian Pledge on Limitation of Advertising to Children
(9 companies)
2010 flag-mexico-150
Mexico
Mexican Marketing to Children Pledge
(14 companies)

GCC
GCC Food and Beverage Pledge on Responsible Marketing and Advertising to Children
(8 companies)
(Expanded and strengthened in 2016)

GCC Pledge Nutrition Criteria White Paper
flag-india-150
India
The India Pledge
(8 companies)
flag-switzerland-150
Switzerland
Switzerland Pledge
(11 companies)
flag-turkey-150
Turkey
The Turkey Pledge
(6 companies, representing majority of food and beverage advertising spend)
2011 flag-philippines-150
Philippines
Philippines Responsible Advertising to Children Initiative
(6 companies)
flag-peru-150
Peru
The Peruvian Advertising Commitment

  • (9 companies)
    2012 flag-singapore-150Singapore The Singapore Responsible Advertising to Children Initiative
    (13 companies)
    2013 flag-malaysian-150Malaysia Malaysian Food and Beverage Industry's "Responsible Advertising to Children" Initiative
    (9 companies)

    Global

    • The IFBA Global Policy on Advertising and Marketing Communications to Children
      For the seventh year, IFBA engaged Accenture Media Management to carry out independent monitoring of members’ compliance with IFBA’s Global Policy on Advertising and Marketing Communications to Children, in a globally representative sample of markets. For 2015, Accenture reported that IFBA members continued to demonstrate a high rate of compliance 97% for television advertising, 99.8% for internet advertising and 100% for print advertising in child-directed media. Accenture examined more than half a million television ads on 397 channels over a three-month period in 10 markets — Brazil, China (Shanghai), Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Accenture also examined print ads in five markets — Brazil, China, India, Russia,Singapore and South Africa and websites in four markets – Brazil, China, Russia and Singapore. To ensure transparency and credibility, all the media research data analyzed by Accenture was gained from sources independent of IFBA companies and their associated media agencies. Accenture also chose the period to be monitored after the advertising space had already been purchased by the companies.companies. To read the report, click here

    Regional

    • The EU Pledge:In 2015, EU Pledge members commissioned Accenture Media Management to review their compliance with the commitment relating to food and beverage advertising on TV; and EASA to review EU Pledge companies’ branded websites for compliance with the commitment. This is the seventh annual monitoring report of the EU Pledge and the record of compliance is positive and consistent with previous years. Accenture’s analysis of more than one million TV spots in seven sample markets (France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal and Spain) during a three-month period found an overall compliance rate of 98.6%. EASA monitored 219 national brand websites in eight EU countries and reported that 97% of websites were compliant with the EU Pledge. In addition to monitoring the implementation of commitments, EU Pledge members have sought to measure the change in the overall balance of their food and beverage TV advertising to children under 12 as a result of the EU Pledge and of companies’ individual commitments. After seven years of monitoring, the EU Pledge has demonstrated a significant change in the balance of food advertising to children towards options that meet common nutrition criteria.  The six year average (2009-2014) confirms a significant decrease in children’s exposure to TV food advertising – an 83% reduction in exposure to ads for products that do not meet nutrition criteria in programmes with an audience composed of over 35% of children; a 48% reduction in exposure to ads for products that do not meet nutrition criteria overall; and  a 32% reduction in exposure to ads for all products, regardless of nutrition criteria (i.e. in all programmes on all channels at all times.)  To read the full report, Click here.
    • The European Advertising Standards Alliance: The European Advertising Standards Alliance (EASA) has conducted pan-annual European monitoring exercises since 2003 for the food and non-alcoholic beverage industry to verify compliance with the ICC Consolidated Code on Advertising and Marketing Communication Practice (2006) and the ICC Framework for Responsible Food and Non-alcoholic Beverage Marketing Communications (2006) and national self-regulatory provisions and laws. In 2012, EASA was commissioned by the World Federation of Advertisers and the EU Pledge Secretariat to review food and beverage brand websites belonging to EU Pledge member companies to determine compliance with the EU Pledge commitment on company-owned websites. A consumer-oriented approach was adopted and conducted by seven European self-regulatory organizations (Czech Republic (CRPR), France (ARPP), Germany (DW), Poland (RR), Spain (Autocontrol), Sweden (Ro) and the UK (ASA)), who reviewed national brand websites of EU Pledge members in order to assess the appeal of marketer-owned websites to children under the age of 12 years. Some of the elements analyzed to determine “appeal” include games, toys , animations as well as ease of language and navigation. In total, 210 national brand websites were reviewed of which 41 were considered as appealing to children younger than 12 years. Of these 42 websites, 11 were found not to comply with EU Pledge criteria as they promoted products to children, which did not meet the nutritional criteria of the companies.To read the full report, click here.
    • The Union of European Soft Drink Associations UNESDA: In 2012/2013, UNESDA appointed the independent monitoring company and broadcast expert, Ebiquity, to audit compliance with its commitments on marketing to children to the European Platform for Action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. The five largest EU markets (representing approximately 65% of the EU population) were monitored in 2012: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. UNESDA members were found to be 99.35% compliant on their commitment to not advertise in television programmes where 35%+ of the audience comprise children under 12 years. This is consistent with the independent audits of 2006 and 2010 which each recorded compliance rates of 99%. Members were 100% compliant in print media (consistent with the 100% compliance level in 2010 and the 99.72% compliance level in 2006); 100% compliant in online media (consistent with the 100% compliance level achieved in 2006 and 2010); 100% compliant with its commitment not to target children under the age of 12 years in the digisphere; and 95.11% compliant on company-owned websites.
      To read the full report, click here

    National

    • Australia:The Responsible Children’s Marketing Initiative (RCMI) and Quick Service Restaurant Initiative for Responsible Advertising and Marketing to Children (QSRI): The Australian Food and Grocery Council’s report for 2014 involves two monitoring components: an external audit and complaint adjudications by the Advertising Standards Board (ASB). Overall, compliance with the RCMI and the QSRI core principles during their sixth year of operation was very high, with 99.7% (RCMI) and 99.5% (QSRI) of signatory advertising being compliant with their commitment under the initiatives. This compliance rate exceeds that recorded in the 2013 Annual Compliance Report (99.5% and 99.2% for the RCMI and QSRI respectively). Results of the external audit found there were some foods that did not meet the signatories’ nutrition criteria advertised during children’s television programs. These occurrences were found to be mainly inadvertent, resulting from either the provision of bonus airtime by the television network or the late scheduling (or change in scheduling) of programmes and were not undertaken at the direction of the signatories. The audit also found that over 60% of breaches occurred on one channel, demonstrating particular need for communication and diligence with this network.
      To read the full report, click here
    • The Australian Food & Grocery Council — Research Report : In May, 2012 the AFGC released the results of an independent study undertaken in 2011 which indicated that RCMI was having a positive effect on reducing children's exposure to high fat, sugar and salt food and beverage (non-core) advertising. The study found that advertisements for non-core foods had fallen to 1.6% of all food and beverage advertisements targeted to children under the age of 12 years on children's television in Australia across eight channels and 0.7% across three channels. According to Australian advertising information service Commercial Monitors, this represented a 60% decrease compared with 2010.
      To read the full report, click here
    • Susannah Tymms Independent Review of RCMI (2012): The AFGC commissioned an independent review of the industry's advertising to children self-regulatory initiatives (RCMI and QSRI) by Susannah Tymms, an expert in agriculture, food and biotechnology policy. The review found a “unanimous, emphatic and enduring commitment to ratification of these Australian codes that limit marketing activity and opportunity” and that these codes have “effected significant changes in marketing principles and strategies within signatory businesses.” Furthermore, the review found that the Advertising Standards Bureau performed its functions in a manner which represents an international best practice model for complaint resolution.
      To read the full report, click here
    • The Canadian Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative: In September 2016, Advertising Standards Canada (ASC) released the 2015 compliance report.  The report confirms continuing high levels of compliance by the 17 participating companies in meeting the programme commitments.  ASC also reports that the category-specific uniform nutrition criteria that came into effect at the end of 2015 (to replace company-specific nutrition criteria) have resulted in improvements to many foods advertised to children through the reduction of sugar, sodium, and saturated fats. ASC also conducts an annual spot check of children’s television advertising.  In 2015, the spot check covered 60 hours of programming during which 1,468 commercial were aired.  The analysis showed that the majority of television advertising directed to children was for toys, games, DVDs, in-theatre movies and attractions.  In 2015 food and beverage commercial accounted for 9% of commecials aired, representing a 25% reduction from 2014, and all were for CAI-approved products.
      To read the full report, click here
    • The U.S. Children's Food and Beverage Marketing Initiative: In December 2016, the Council of Better Business Bureaus published the compliance and progress report for 2015 for the Children's Food & Beverage Initiative (CFBAI). The report noted that overall pledge compliance was "excellent" and that participants in the initiative, which represent the majority of food advertising on children’s television programming, have “made measureable progress in improving the nutritional quality of the foods they advertise to children.” To read the full report, click here